http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #11 from Mason James <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > And if somebody likes to add a followup.. Why not say that kohaversion must > > be koha_db_version? In the very exceptional case that kohaversion=3.10 and > > db version= 3.12, something goes wrong. Wouldn't that be safe to go to > > maintenance as well? > > Added note: I changed this in the code when testing. It is a different thing > coming there.. hmmm, a good question Marcel, but i think this is a bad idea... there are valid/legitimate situations both for production and dev/testing usage, where people may want to load a newer db onto an older Koha codebase. your proposed change would stop this from happening -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
