https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10869
--- Comment #105 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #104) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #103) > > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #102) > > > (In reply to Andrew Fuerste-Henry from comment #95) > > > > I would disallow the deletion and instead direct the user to first > > > > cancel > > > > the order. > > > > > > This makes sense. Probably many Koha installs contain pollution due to > > > allowing the deletion of biblio records while being used in ACQ. > > > > if you want to cancel, that's ok. But if you want to delete the record > > because it has left the collection? I think the solution needs some more > > complexity. > > As suggested, if you want to delete, then remove the linked orders first; > you can always add a new order.. Maybe we are misunderstanding each other. I hope this helps: If the orderstatus is "new" or "ordered" things are probably easy and we could do with the check and note. For standing orders it already gets a bit more complicated, so we need to add "partial" as well. But we will also need to think about how to handle deleting records for aqorders with orderstatus "cancelled" or "received". But this might be out of scope here I realize. Also you can't really 'remove linked orders'. We can only cancel or delete a whole basket. If you have multiple order lines in a basket, there is no way to remove just one (odd, right?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
