https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36264
Bug ID: 36264
Summary: XSLT processing is much slower on OPAC than Staff
Interface
Change sponsored?: ---
Product: Koha
Version: master
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5 - low
Component: Searching
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
QA Contact: [email protected]
I haven't figured this one out yet, but it looks like the XSLT processing for
search results is much slower on the OPAC than on the Staff Interface.
No XSLT (disabled in code):
OPAC: 18.69 seconds
Staff: 10.5 seconds
Default XSLT:
OPAC: 25.7 seconds
Staff: 10.6 seconds
As you can see here, the XSLT processing for the staff interface is much
faster. I’d say the OPAC takes 7 seconds whereas the Staff takes .1 seconds.
This is certainly worth reviewing.
(Note I'm using Zebra but it should be irrelevant for this testing. The same
problem should exist for both Zebra and Elasticsearch...)
(Note also that it's clearly not the only discrepancy between the two search
interfaces. Note that OpacHiddenItems isn't contributing to the slowness on the
OPAC side.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
