https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18360
--- Comment #23 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #21) > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #20) > > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #18) > > > Taking a closer look - maybe also to be handled on a separate bug: > > > > > > Why is it necessary to delete the record first? I could imagine libraries > > > still having the record with older items or other linked orders. > > > > > > + alert( _("Please delete the linked bibliographic > > > record first.") ); > > > > Probably had in mind to prevent 'ghost records' in the catalog. Created by > > Acquisition and now having no links anymore. > > Could imagine that there will be different opinions here. > > Maybe still move that to a new report? > > Yes, it was not meant as a blocker here. Just wondering about reasoning. > I'll add additional_work_needed as a reminder for this loose end. Bug 36731 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
