https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26869
--- Comment #31 from Pedro Amorim <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Esther Melander from comment #26) > This is very close, but I wanted to share some notes from my testing. > > Following the testing plan, created a template that added only a 952$a and I > did receive a error message on why the item was not added. > > My next template looked like this: > > Add 952$a CPL > Add 952$b CPL > Add 952$y BK > > This template does work when modifying the record from the Bibliographic > detail page. It adds a single item record. However, if this same template is > used in Stage MARC records, it adds three item records. > > A better template would look like this: > > Add 952$a CPL > Update existing or add new field 952$b CPL > Update existing or add new field 952$y BK > > This template will add only one item record in both scenarios. > > This is perhaps not a blocker and I will happily sign-off. Just wanted to > make a note that the behavior is different and it should probably be > consistent. Interesting and fair points. I'm not entirely sure what the best course of action would be here, if any is required. Comparing the code from stage MARC and biblio records modification nothing obvious stands out to me, although these are certainly 2 different areas in the code. Can you please provide a more detailed test plan (or include a MARC records file - if required) so that I can try and reproduce the exact use case and test further? Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
