https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36727
Alex Buckley <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff --- Comment #17 from Alex Buckley <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Janusz Kaczmarek from comment #16) > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #15) > > Seems that we create an inconsistency here? 023 is not in issn but it is in > > issn-all? > > If I may comment on this: I wouldn't say that. The 023 field is a new field > introduced only recently instead of the removed 022 $l subfield (a linking > ISSN). > > https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd023.html > https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd022.html (infra) > > So, the logic is: with issn-all search field we want to be able to find a > record/all records with any ISSN related to that content, e.g. we want to be > able to find the online and paper version of a serial with one search. > > Whereas issn search field should remain for the precise search: I want to > get exactly that record with exactly this ISSN in 022 $a. > > With this logic I do not see a possibility nor need to put any 023 subfield > in issn search field. This makes sense to us! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
