https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36996
--- Comment #3 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #2) > OpacHiddenItems gives me nightmares. Are we sure that we want to add more > things like it? > > Shouldn't OpacHiddenItems already cover off this scenario? I think this is a different thing. They don't want to hide the items, they want a simplified version of availability and Nick just meant "a yaml preference". Koha uses several fields and attributes to determine availability (damaged, restricted, notforloan...) and not all systems are happy to deal with that. But I wonder about the functionality that was built into the z39.50 responder - didn't that have a similar goal? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
