https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37595
David Cook <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Owen Leonard from comment #2) > For this particular case it looks like we can convert the '&' to '&' in > guided_reports.pl between line 974 and 979. > Generally, it looks like we're using '&' in a lot of Perl code where I > don't think we need to. For instance at line 345 of basketgroup.pl: > There's no need to encode that &. I'm guessing that in most places we use > & it's because obsolete XHTML validator rules required us to. A current > validator won't complain about it and I question whether there are places > that require it for other reasons. +1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
