https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37902

--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Nick Clemens (kidclamp) from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #13)
> > There is still (at least) one failing test:
> > 
> >             #   Failed test 'Filtering by date-time works'
> >             #   at t/db_dependent/api/v1/patrons.t line 177.
> >             #          got: undef
> >             #     expected: '401'
> >             # Looks like you failed 1 test of 12.
> > 
> > I don't think we are processing the values correctly. Why do we add like
> > operator for dates? Do we want to keep this behaviour?
> > 
> > I really need feedback and review on those patches before continuing working
> > on this.
> 
> I think the like search for dates would only be used for partial date search
> in a column - i.e. "2024-07" - but we could probably replace that with
> year/month/day dropdowns - or just a datepicker and have reports for more
> complicated date searching?

Yes, but this could be done client-side. If we are passing an
invalid/incomplete date then we can build the "like" part ourselves.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to