https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36054
Kyle M Hall (khall) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #172102|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #8 from Kyle M Hall (khall) <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 172115 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=172115&action=edit Bug 36054: Don't mark MARC21 005 as mandatory in frameworks now that AddBiblio and ModBibilio will set it no matter what With bug 35993, both AddBiblio and ModBiblio will add a missing 005 or update an existing 005 to the current timestamp. That makes setting it as mandatory in bib frameworks pointless: whether you remove it, blank it, or set it, what you do doesn't matter because it will be set, and set to something different than what you set. Test plan: 1. Apply patch, reset_all 2. Administration - MARC bibliographic framework 3. In the Default framework row, Actions - MARC structure 4. In the 005 row, verify the Mandatory column says No 5. 005 row, Actions - View subfields 6. For the @ subfield, verify constraints says Not mandatory Extra credit: Set EnableAdvancedCatalogingEditor to Enable and in both editors try to save a record without a 005 or with one set to your choice of value, and then in the MARC preview verify that no matter what there is always a 005 with a value other than yours. Bonus for exporting a record, editing it with an external editor to remove the 005, reimporting it, and verifying that the imported record has a 005. Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
