https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19113

Sukhmandeep <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sukhmandeep.benipal@inLibro
                   |                            |.com

--- Comment #14 from Sukhmandeep <[email protected]> ---
I looked through the code and I believe we can delete the second instance. I
removed the db_max method from the hbyymmincr.pm file and tested to see if the
correct barcode is generated when the patch is applied, and everything seems to
be working fine.

I don't think there is any other barcode that follows the hbyymmXXXX format. If
someone could also go through the process on their side (remove the db_max
method and check if the full test works), it would allow us to delete the
method without any issues.

The test plan is the same as before:
Test
- It's a bit complicated.  You need
   - all your branchcodes to be numerics (01,02,71...)
   - all barcodes to already be a bunch of numbers
- Modify the syspref 'autobarcode' to hbyymmincr, the home branch + date one.
- Find an item in the pro-search,
- New -> New Item
- Click on the 'p' to have the value builder create the next barcode.
   - Without the patch, the query won't have found anything, so it'll suggest
xxxxxx0001
- Click Add.  It reprensent the form to enter another one.
   - Click on the 'p' edit box, it'll offer you again xxxxxx0001
With the patch, it'll offer valid ones everytime.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to