http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10335
mathieu saby <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] | |r --- Comment #2 from mathieu saby <[email protected]> --- Hello Janusz Good idea, but I would like to make some comments before testing : The $8 contains the code for a language, not for a kind of script. Scripts codes are stored in $7, on 2 characters (interesting info = position 4-5) ba latin ca cyrillic fa arabe ga grec ha hébreu etc. The $8 subfield (not mandatory) can be used in 7XX, but also in 2XX or 4XX. So, you can have a field coded in case of romanized record, you can have 2 repeated fields, with the same $8, but different $7. That's the way we work in France. I hope it is not wrong... Ex from unimarc manual : 200 #1 $7ba0yba0a $8engrus $aGlinka,$bMihail Ivanovič 200 #1 $7ba0yca0y $8engrus $aГлинка,$bМихайл Иванович The $7 is mandatory in case of double script records, but the $8 is not mandatory. The possible codes in $7 are limited (a dozen), but ALL 639-2 iso codes can be used in $8. So I wonder if managing them in the templates is a good solution. So, could you tell me if your patch deals only with 7XX fields ? M. Saby -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
