https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38336
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Saby <[email protected]> --- I had time to do some archeology : Before bug 30373 (conversion to yaml, and suppression of the french framework) the french UNIMARC framework was quite different from the english one. The new yaml framework seems to have inherited from both, in a way that is not completely correct. * History of the french UNIMARC framework before its conversion to yaml : In 2008 : At biblio level : - no 942 field - 099 field "information locales" (local information) only used for creation and modification dates - 200$b field "type de document" (document type) <=> biblioitems.itemtype, linked to itemtypes AV - 686$a field "type (indice)" linked with itemtypes AV At item level : 995$r field "type de prêt" (type of loan) mapped with items.itype, linked to itemtypes AV Note that the label was "type of loan" and not "Type of item and material" like in the english framework Bug 6557 in 2012 : - creation of a 942 field "total des prêts" (number of checkouts) with only one subfield $0 Bug 11586 in 2014 : - 686$a and 200$b fields no longer mapped with biblioitems.itemtype neither linked to any AV - new subfield 099$t "Type de document" (document type) <=> biblioitems.itemtype, not linked to any AV - new subfield 099$x "Nombre de prêts" (number of checkouts) <=> biblioitems.totalissues => duplicate of 942$0 ! At item level : 995$r field "type de prêt" has now a default value "PRETLIV" (loan of book) => weird because it did not fit the values defined in sample_itemtypes.sql At that point (just before the framework conversion to yaml) 099$t and 995$r were both mapped to biblioitems.itemtype, BUT only 995$r were linked to itemtypes AV. French libraries were free to linked their 099$t to the AV of their choice (like "TYPEDOC") ======== Changes to english UNIMARC framework : In 2008 : At biblio level : 990 field "ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)", with: 990$0 : Koha issues (borrowed) <=> biblioitems.totalissues 990$c : Koha item type <=> biblioitems.itemtype ; linked to itemtypes AV At item level : 995$r field "Type of item and material", mapped with nothing, not linked to any AV Bug 5128 in 2010 (at the initiative of the Italian Zeno Tajoli https://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2010-July/034235.html ) - Removal of 990 field - Creation of 099 field "local dates" : same use as 099 of fr-FR framework, but with a different name, more restrictive (in french it was "local information" - Creation of 942 field "ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)", with : 942$0 : Koha issues (borrowed) <=> biblioitems.totalissues 942$c : Koha item type <=> biblioitems.itemtype ; linked with itemtypes AV At item level : the 995$r field (Type of item and material) is mapped with 'items.itype' and linked with 'itemtypes' At that point (just before the framework conversion to yaml) 942$c and 995$r were both mapped to biblioitems.itemtype, AND linked to itemtypes AV (contrary to the french framework). The use of 099 was more restricted than in french framework, the use of 942 much broader. And the wording of 099, 942 and 995$r were different from french framework. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
