https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38042
--- Comment #9 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- Mathieu, what are you fighting for? I am not advocating against having a resource type field. I am advocating to have feature parity again for UNIMARC and MARC21 users. The easiest way to get there in my opinion is to have a new separate field for the resource type and re-map to itemtypes for the other field. I think this would be code-wise the easiest fix to have the best of both worlds and stop the current situation where MARC21 and UNIMARC pull in different directions in development, which leads to broken features for users of one MARC flavors and an ongoing need to fix bugs like this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
