http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8956
--- Comment #57 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- The test plan in comment 8 that is ; ) I've also attached a qa followup to remove that print line from the db update. (In reply to comment #56) > He followed the test plan in part 8. > > (In reply to comment #54) > > Just some advance remarks: > > > > In total this is a larger patch. It could be advantageous if Paul as the one > > signing off, could further elaborate on what he exactly tested. Did you test > > various numbering patterns, how much data was converted in the upgrade, etc. > > etc. In this way we can build up some more confidence in this development. > > > > I just had a quick look: > > > > The upgrade reports lines like : NUMBERING METHOD: '{X}' Does not seem to be > > very informative? > > The label X, etc with Appears in numbering formula as {XL} do not seem very > > easy to understand on Edit subscription? [This already held for numbering > > patterns, but life is not simpler now..] > > Funny date in next issue publication date: 02/00/0 Do not know what happened > > here, but could be an existing problem.. > > > > Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
