https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37546
--- Comment #12 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #9) > I am going to mark it as Failed QA for now, because I think this is > misleading. > > Instead of "record", I think I'd say "result". I'm going to upload a > screenshot of my test, and then add some more commentary... I think it would be wise to wrap the Z39.50 error message in quotes. At first, I thought 239 might be the bib number, and then I thought there might be a bug... and then I realised that "239" is actually the error code. So it might also be worthwhile to write it out like... "[Error code: 239] - Record syntax not support" If you look at https://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/contributions/1.html they suggest a "Recommended display" but it would require way too much work I reckon. But... we could do a hybrid like: "Record syntax not supported (ref. 239)" Because then I search "z39.50 ref 239" in a search engine, and I get useful data for my first hit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
