https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39057
--- Comment #5 from Pedro Amorim <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mathieu Saby from comment #4) > But rather than asking a vendor to write a very specific patch for such and > such field, my idea was a more generic way to do it, by giving the library > the ability to define its own supplementary fields, like we can do in other > parts of Koha. I can definitely see how additional fields applied to ILL requests in this way makes sense. May be tricky how this interacts with illrequestattributes (or not), but definitely doable and valuable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
