https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38879
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Saby <[email protected]> --- Well, the process you describe isn't exactly optimal. I don't want my colleagues in charge of printed book acquisitions to have to choose from 20 suppliers if we only have 2 printed book suppliers. Having a "print workflow" and "electronic workflow" could be useful. For example with no need of "reception" step for electronic workflow. Shouldn't all this be discussed as part of the module redesign? And yes at least a checkbox should be useful for e-ressource. 2 checkbox at least in fact, to distinguish the supplier who produces the ressource (ex : Springer), but to whom we do not send invoices, and the one to whom you are actually paying for this ressource (ex : a library consortium, a subscription agency like Ebsco...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
