https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38340
--- Comment #47 from Tomás Cohen Arazi (tcohen) <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #46) > I'd really really like to see this fixed, but I am not sure I understand the > suggestion: > > My vote would be keeping it as-is. But I leave it to y'all to decide. I can > do either. > > So that means ignoring the failures or am I misunderstanding? I think then > we'd also need to take that into account for the QA script rewrite that aims > to have all tests passing on all files. I think we should push this ASAP and discuss somewhere else if the QA tools should be added an exception. I would just include all the files where needed, predating reusability. If this was a real blocker. We really need someone with a strong opinion against this patch set to express how they would do it. Otherwise taste predates a much needed feature and that’s bad for the project and the users -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
