https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39545
--- Comment #16 from Heather Hernandez <[email protected]> --- Retired cataloger here!! Looking at Comment 15 from Martin, all looks good with these caveats/comments: I really must object to "Remove generation of subfield s from the 240 field entirely" because VAST quantities of records have an incredibly valuable 240 that absolutely must be included in the 773, including records for Bibles, books of the Bible, laws and statutes, and translations. The preservation of this string in the 773 is essential, and frequently used--analytic records/child records are, indeed, created for these entities due to their being issued serially, for chapters/parts being used/assigned in academic settings, analytic/child records being cataloged for relevant treaties and/or conventions issued in compilations, etc. Especially for legal materials, the $s and the $t should be included together--it's normal to include both, anyway. These fields are incredibly important for academic libraries, specialized libraries, government libraries, law libraries, etc. There should also be generation of subfield d from 264, since many catalogs have newer records with a 264 while also having older records with a 260. Hope this helps!! --h2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
