http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7688
Galen Charlton <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #103 from Galen Charlton <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #101) > This is a huge patch. I am a bit worried of incorporating this without > feedback from a library using serials and subscriptions - especially worried > about the database update. Is it possible that we could get an anonymizsed > database from a library with lots of subscriptions to test with? I have a Koha database available to me with a large number of subscriptions that will be suitable for verifying that no regressions occur during upgrade, and I will be using that during testing. By the way, at the point in time that I am reading to push this patch, I intend to include a follow-up that makes the SQL for frequencies and numbering patterns mandatory during installation. If a user doesn't plan to use serials, populating the table doesn't hurt; if they do plan to use serials, making them start from scratch if they didn't run those scripts during installation only increases the height of the bar for a module that is inherently already difficult. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
