https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40119
Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |In Discussion --- Comment #5 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Janusz Kaczmarek from comment #0) > Currently, when removing 040 $f from authority record with 008/11 = 'z' > (MARC 21), merge function removes the content of $2 subfield in linked 6XX > fields, leaving the 6XX $2 subfield empty. This is not correct. We should > not have empty subfields in a MARC record. > > Instead, the old content of the $2 subfield should be retained (if auth > 008/11 is still = 'z'). > > [It is perfectly correct in MARC 21 to have authority records with 008/11 = > 'z' and no 040 $f. In such a case, in the related biblio 6XX fields 2nd ind. > should be = '7', and '7' implies the presence of $2 subfield, which would be > filled by hand or by other means.] Yeah, an empty $2 is weird. But I am not completely sure about retaining the old value or removing the subfield. If we explicitly remove the 040f value from the authority (while having that old value in all linked biblio records and keeping it), wouldnt that be confusing? Do you have any MARC documentation support for leaving 040f empty to allow $2 values on the bib side (even different ones)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
