https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40275

--- Comment #21 from David Cook <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to David Cook from comment #20)
> I'm just going to quickly pop this to "In Discussion". 
> 
> Do we want to drop the patch "Implement find_by_identifier for
> check_cookie_auth" and handle the move to borrowernumber on a separate bug? 
> 
> Alternatively, we leave the patch in, but knowing that it really should be
> replaced with a borrowernumber lookup? 
> 
> I think Aleisha raises a really interesting point here.

FYI I'm just looking for something like "Yeah, let's handle it on a separate
bug", or "No, maybe we should handle it here". Not trying to derail the
progress here.

Might be worthwhile just opening an Omnibus bug for the "Use borrowernumber
instead of userid/cardnumber where possible", and then we raise a child report
for "check_cookie_auth" (and all the other bugs I've reported ont his topic). I
think I'm probably inclined to go that direction myself, but curious what other
people think.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to