https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37054
--- Comment #81 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #80) > Looking back over my latest comments on bug 26129, I can see that I think > `configurations` table might be too generic. But... I'm open to the idea. > The cool thing about the `configurations` table is that if we decided later > it wasn't 100% to purpose it would be easy to migrate to something more > specific as well. > > Personally, I think the idea of a `ui_branches_themes` or > `ui_themes_branches` might be an idea. We could move "OPAC information", > "Specific OPAC JS", and "Specific OPAC CSS" to that table. If we give each > theme a file-system friendly name, we could potentially map this to the > filesystem so that libraries could easily link in JS and CSS files as well. I'm not too fussed on the actual implementation, but yeah a separate table would be good. I have been thinking for a little while that having some ui_* specific tables could be good. Tables like `columns_settings` and `tables_settings` for instance would be better organised with a `ui_` prefix I suspect. Could be good to break out a lot of system preferences into ui_* table(s) instead of being in system_preferences as well... But anyway... -- Trying to say you've got my support, Tomas! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
