https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40476

Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected],
                   |                            |[email protected]
                   |                            |o.uk

--- Comment #7 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to David Cook from comment #6)
> (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #4)
> > What about existing item type codes? Or importing them?
> 
> They'll still be problems.
> 
> We could possibly try to add some more backend validation and throw errors
> for invalid item types, but I even that could be bypassed by people
> inserting directly into the database with migration scripts, so I'm not sure
> how effective that would be in the end either.
> 
> Fixing these problems is quite annoying as well, because you have to update
> the database and then reindex all affected records, which on a large
> database can be quite time intensive at the very least. 
> 
> I don't have any good answers on this one I think. For now, I thought we
> could add the client-side validation to try steering things in a better
> direction. But I'm open to ideas.

I dont have a strong argument to block this patch. But just being a bit
hesitant since it feels doing half the work needed. And we have so much of
these things already in Koha. Asking hereby for feedback from others.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to