https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38336
--- Comment #29 from Mathieu Saby <[email protected]> --- I wanted to stay close to the historical configuration, which combined 099 and 942 fields, but I understand the value of simplification. Placing all "koha-specific" information in a unique field, which could easily be 099 rather than 942, would be convenient, and a lot of libraries already have this kind of configuration. I can rewrite this patch by removing the three subfields from 942 that duplicate subfields from 099 (you mention 942$c and $s, but I believe there is also 942$0, which duplicates 099$x). A subsequent patch could deal with the "suppressed" flag (there is already a BZ for that) A last patch could allow us to get rid of 942 field completely by moving the rest of its subfields to 099 field. However, before doing any of this, I would like to send a general message to the koha-info list to check that there are no objections to this simplification (I highly doubt it!). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
