https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27248
--- Comment #8 from Brendan Lawlor <[email protected]> --- Thanks for testing this Owen! (In reply to Owen Leonard from comment #7) > + [% new_due_dates.size %] > > Is this change a mistake? It's just a number floating in space. This is indeed a stray tag from testing. > I think this needs some further refinement. I would expect that if I was > pasting a batch of barcodes that none of the other filters would be > relevant. I shouldn't be required to select a range of due dates unless the > process was going to select only the barcodes in my batch which matched that > due date range (which it does not). The other filters still do work together with the barcode list. The logic is AND for all of them, so for example if you put in a barcode list and a due date from, it will only extend due dates for the barcodes where the current due date is after the due date from. The range of due dates filter is not required, but I can see how that's not entirely clear too. Only one of the New due date fields is actually required, you can leave the rest of the form blank and it will do all items. It also wasn't clear to me until I started testing that the Libraries filter is for the checkout branch. I could see a use case for adding the item owning library to this tool at some point too. For a consortium I think it makes sense to be able to use other filters in tandem with a barcode list as a way to further control and confirm that you are only extending due dates with specific criteria. > My first instinct is to say we should have a tabbed interface like we have > with other batch operations: One tab with the original form with search > criteria and another tab with the barcode input. Since the barcodes work together with the other filters, I think a single form is more clear, but I will take a closer look at examples on other batch operation forms too. > I assume the bug should be retitled to drop the 'itemnumbers'? I think barcodes is what librarians tend to work with more than the itemnumbers, so that's where I started with this. For the next step of integrating this into Report batch operations I don't think it matters much which one is used, but I'd be interested in any opinions on that matter too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
