http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10508
--- Comment #27 from Galen Charlton <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Srdjan Jankovic from comment #26) > That is exactly what I'm trying to figure out - why do you find it easier > that way. I would always want them together. Not arguing at all, as a QA you > absolutely have right to ask for it to be delivered in a way that it suits > you (it will get merged all together in the end anyway), just finding it > interesting. In part, it's a consequence of following the TDD notion of writing the tests first. Depending on the nature of the bug, having the first patch contain the test cases allows one to apply just that patch, then run the tests, then see from the (presumptive) test failures the essence of the bug being fixed and/or the contract of the new routines being added or the changes to the contract of the routines being changed. Now that the stage of the little story that the patch series is telling is set and effective *documented* by the first patch, the subsequent patches round it out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
