https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40659
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Fuerste-Henry <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #8) > It would also introduce a security vulnerability. > > I was weighing up whether to use "Failed QA" or "In Discussion", but I > figured I'd opt for the former. > > I think an argument could be made that other Notes & Slips might already > have vulnerabilities in them. I haven't reviewed them in depth. > > However, for new code, I think that we want to do better - in any case. Can you provide some further detail on what "do better" would mean to you in this situation? What is it about the approach on 39860 that meets your needs better than the work here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
