https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40272
--- Comment #15 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #10) > Hi Lucas, > > Good catch. The new biblio case should surely have been included in the > original test plan.. > > I did a bit more than adding the strictly needed "if $biblio"-check in the > addbiblio script on the follow-up. > I also added a check too in the extractor code on having a MARC::Record > object. Actually this should imo be in Extractor::MARC->metadata. But that > should enlarge the scope of this report too much for now. Will open a new > report for that. > And added both cases in unit tests: metadata is just a string, metadata is > an empty MARC::Record object. Sorry for the noise here. But I finally decided not to include more changes but do a quick fix here. And add more changes on the new report. Adjusting the check_fixed_length too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
