https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38122
--- Comment #41 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mathieu Saby from comment #40) > I tested on a sandbox, and it seems to work. But honestly, I'm not sure that > it really meets the needs of libraries—maybe, maybe not... Other people > should test it. What are your needs? > As this is not specified in your test plan, could you please clarify how > sorting is supposed to be performed by your patch? Based on the value of > "_status" returned by the API? Will "available" items appear first (it seems > so from my test)? available, checked_out, local_use, in_transit, lost, withdrawn, damaged, not_for_loan, on_hold, recalled, in_bundle, restricted > From a librarian's point of view, this "grouping" does not seem very > different from a "sort", except that you can't reverse the order. But if I > understand correctly, it would be really technically complicated to control > this feature with an arrow in the column header like for the other columns? It can eventually be implemented later, but it's not within the scope of this bug. Any other changes must be on separate bug reports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
