https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41248
Kyle M Hall (khall) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |Needs Signoff Patch complexity|--- |Small patch --- Comment #2 from Kyle M Hall (khall) <[email protected]> --- It seems inefficient to rebuild the holds queue repeatedly for the same record. We should skip enqueuing BatchUpdateBiblioHoldsQueue jobs if there is already a queued job that hasn't started. Test Plan: 1) Enable real time holds queue 2) Ensure the default queue background job worker is not running 3) Set up 2 or more holds for the record 4) Alter the priority for those holds a couple times 5) Confirm only one new job is in the background_jobs table for that record. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
