https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41275
--- Comment #1 from Pedro Amorim <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 189717 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=189717&action=edit Bug 41275: Drop vendor in favor of relationshipSelect This is only a PoC for AgreementResource. More are needed. Type = 'vendor' was a measure taken at the time to solve the issue immediatelly, but we have since abstracted 'simple' relationships to use relationshipSelect and there's no reason to continue using type: 'vendor'. The thing I'd like comments on here is that an API call is done by relationshipSelect, whereas before the vendors were coming from the vendorStore loaded in ERM. AFAIK, this vendorStore load in ERM is still required to populate the 'vendor' table column filter options. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
