https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41400

--- Comment #7 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Mathieu Saby from comment #6)
> I am well aware that this would be a major change that would require long
> and in-depth discussions before it could possibly come to fruition... Well,
> today is not the day to resolve all that, the turkey is waiting for me ;-)

Turkey on new year's? :) Enjoy!

Please don't think I am saying we could not have a resource/document type on
record level - I think it would indeed be useful. We have created one and use a
custom (9xx) field for it. I also have code ready in our XSlT to display it and
we will use it for search facets too.

My argument is that it should be its own thing, not using a field that is also
used for other purposes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to