https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27834
--- Comment #31 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens (kidclamp) from comment #29) > 2 - CheckoutLimitScope - decides how we count the patron's checkouts against > the rule - this is what libraries don't like, that the choice in #1 decides > #2 - this is why I think it should be independent It still feels kind of wrong to me to solve it like that. We are actually creating an override for circulation rules that are specified for specific branches to apply them globally or vice versa. (On the alternative bug, I am correcting TooMany to apply branch rules at branch level and global rules at glubal level. Which feels to me more consistent.) Looking back to the actual cause of this report, the library chose PatronLibrary instead of PickupLibrary to get a global scope (but a wrong calendar along). But if we solved the bug in TooMany that applies a global rule on branch level (see 41280) then they could have defined a global rule (read: without a branch) for patron_maxissueqty and stick to PickupLibrary for the right calendar. Could you still have a look at 41280? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
