https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41726
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Fuerste-Henry <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #2) > Maybe it could be an option/checkbox? > One problem is that we currently can't use the item search to find the > entries where the value is not set, which could be useful in a lot of cases. A checkbox for "include NULL values in 'is not' searches" makes sense to me, for sure. I'd just hate to hardcode something that makes item search silently diverge from standard SQL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
