http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10078
--- Comment #8 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- Hm maybe for others reading this we should clarify: > 1) If you limit on Branch A and location D, you should get no results in > your scenario. That would be how we want it, but it's not going to happen as for the facets always everything that appears in the record is taken into account. So all item information is mixed together - if you have a branch and a location appearing in your record, the facets will show up, even if the information belongs to different items. > 2) In what scenario would you be able to use both those facets? (Using the > Advanced Search, you could, but that's unrelated to the facets.) Yes, advanced search can give confusing results too - but I think it's a lot less obvious and users are not so likely to try. > If you choose Branch A from the Libraries facet, you would only be presented > with location C as a Locations facet. If you choose location D, you would > only be presented with Branch B as a Libraries facet. Unfortunately that's not the case - see explanation above. > I don't think it's an indexing issue though. From what I've seen so far, it > seems to me that DOM and GRS-1 fill the same indexes, they just do it in > different ways. With DOM indexing, I think, the issue could be solved, but not with GRS - and it's currently not implemented. Just trying to explain why I think this change is likely to cause some confusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
