https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38336

--- Comment #35 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Laurence Rault from comment #28)
> The changes that could be made without discussion from my point of view are
> : 
> - The 200$b field is no more indexed (it is now obsolete in
> cataloguing standards, and its MARC21 counterpart is not indexed).
> - The TYPEDOC authorized values category, which was used for
> controlling the value if itemtype at record level, is removed.
> - The default values for itemtype at biblio and item level are
> the same, controlled by itype values (document type).
> - In Koha.pm UNIMARC facets are fixed to be a mirror of MARC21
> facets: a facet for itemtypes is created, and the facet for ccode
> is now based only on items.
> 
> However, I think that it would be better to keep all the local data in one
> 099 field, instead of splitting between 099 (for the dates) and 942.
> This choice does not concern unimarc standard, it has no impact regarding
> the functionality, but a lot of Unimarc libraries now in France are using
> the 099. It is handy to display all the Koha data in the same place.
> So I think  there is no need to rename field 099 to "Local dates (Koha)"
> For the field 099, I would propose :
> - 099$t : set itemtype instead of TYPEDOC
> 
> For the field 942 : 
> - 942$c : remove the kohafield link and the authorised value
> - 942$s : remove the kohafield link
> no subfield should be mandatory in this field
> 
> Update the index accordingly
> 
> For the 099, we could also add : 
> 099$o : hidden in opac, linked to the YES_NO authorized value
> But this may be another BZ

Laurence, could you please check the latest status of this patch in view of
your comments?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to