https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41932
--- Comment #19 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #18) > > I can obviously move this to a separate module. But all my items are on > > Generic and this is just a little pref-controlled tweak of Generic imo. See > > also earlier remarks. > > It just seems a bit risky? Like it would be very easy to get the wrong rule > applying to the wrong items? What I mean is... even as a separate module I don't think it would be enough? What I've been finding in some libraries is that they make up a variety of call number schemes and expect them all to sort automagically. Of course, they'd have to choose the correct scheme, so maybe having them all as Generic is best to reduce mental load on cataloguers. I don't know. It's a tricky one. In a way, something is better than what we have now. I'm going to need to think more on this one. I should try some of my real world call number examples... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
