https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38133
--- Comment #7 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Janusz Kaczmarek from comment #6) > (In reply to David Cook from comment #5) > > Hmm there are other types of records than bib and auth records though so it > > makes the name less descriptive I think? > > Thanks for commenting. I followed Fridolin's suggestion. What would be yours > in this case? touch_records.pl would be fine? What do you think about "touch_all_marc_records.pl"? It's quite specific which would be both a pro and a con for the future... I mean... touch_all_records.pl might be fine. Maybe touch_all_items.pl should be merged in at a later date as another record type. That could make sense. Yeah maybe stick with "touch_all_records.pl" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
