https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41950
--- Comment #31 from Tomás Cohen Arazi (tcohen) <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #30) > My concern is to know how we will prevent new +count occurrences that won't > have the corresponding dbic relation (i.e. how do we write an xt test for > that, what I tried but failed). Yeah, I'm trying too and don't like the results. It's always a bit fragile. > And how do we document that, how the consumers can know if they can sort on > it or not? On QA I always enforce the relationship name. There are some old ones and some I didn't QA myself. I've just added two coding guidelines: * https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Coding_Guidelines#.5BDRAFT.5D_PERL15.1.2:_DBIC_relationship_naming * https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Coding_Guidelines#.5BDRAFT.5D_PERL15.1.3:_Filtered_relationships_.28coderef_conditions.29 Those rules I'm pushing to the handbook as well. PS: I wanted them voted but the meeting was over when I was done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
