https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42846
David Nind <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from David Nind <[email protected]> --- Testing notes (using KTD, MARC21 instance): 1. Updated MARC for record 262 (Programming Perl) with one item (39999000011418, item number = 578) using the SQL in the test plan. 2. Error message before the patch: Biblionumber 262 has biblioitemnumber '262' but should be '262' in 999$d 3. Error message after the patch: Biblionumber 262 has biblioitemnumber '1111' but should be '262' in 999$d I find the message confusing, because 'biblioitemnumber' looks wrong to me. The record number (biblionumber) is 262, but the item number (itemnumber) is 578. What happens when there are multiple items for a record. Or is the 999$d something else? Normally when we say biblioitemnumber, we are referring to the database id for the individual item(?). Or is this just something weird in MARC21 and makes much more sense with UNIMARC? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
