https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41608
--- Comment #17 from Arthur Suzuki <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #16) > (In reply to Arthur Suzuki from comment #12) > > > So yeah I think maybe it's a bug. It probably makes sense to AND different > > > types of facets/filters, but when the type is the same it should probably > > > be > > > ORed. > > > > That is what we want to propose with this bug :) > > Ok but the way to do that would be in how the "limit" parameter is processed > rather than changing the CCL query. yep, I just got the implementation working, it is indeed much simpler and the compatibility with the current behaviour of searching is better preserved (QueryFuzzy, Truncate, etc...) I will do some more checks and post a bit later. Thx for the hints! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
