https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38256

Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Passed QA                   |Failed QA

--- Comment #26 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> ---
I was about to test the follow-up and give this another nudge, but started
wondering: 

Are we creating the link in the right direction?

With this patch you can link an identity provider to a vendor record.
You could also link multiple data providers to one vendor.

But: Would it maybe be more likely the other way around as one data provider
might be a platform serving for multiple publishers/vendors?

So would we rather like to link multiple vendors to the same data provider? 

Another use case that comes to mind is when different branches have their own
vendor record, but the electronic resources are purchased collectively (hope
that makes sense)

Then the column should be created on the aqbooksellers table.

(Failed QA for raising attention, please feel free to set back to PQA)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to