https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23817

--- Comment #41 from Andrew Fuerste-Henry <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to David Cook from comment #39)
> (In reply to Andrew Fuerste-Henry from comment #38)
> > Searching works for any variant that includes numbers and spaces, but fails
> > once I include the dashes or parens, so the patron doesn't come up when I
> > search for their phone number exactly as it appears in the record.
> 
> Hmm good to know. I thought I would've tested that, but the unit test is
> missing it, so I'll need to update that. Do you have some example phone
> numbers I could use for testing?
> 
> > Also, this normalization is not applied to the Standard search when Primary
> > Phone is added to DefaultPatronSearchFields.
> 
> Hmm ok I can look that.
> 
> > Finally, the QA tools are mad about missing POD.
> > [FAIL] Koha/Patrons/DataTables.pm
> >    FAIL       pod_coverage
> >             sub _parse_dbic_query_for_dt has no pod coverage.
> 
> This one is driving me crazy. It seems like Tomas arbitrarily started
> requiring POD for private/internal methods when that's not a thing that's
> typically done for Perl modules...
> 
> https://gitlab.com/koha-community/qa-test-tools/-/work_items/
> 103#note_3167812268

I've put the question of POD for private methods on the agenda for tomorrow's
dev meeting.

In testing this I just used the number from the test plan, '1-(234)-567-8901'

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to