https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41297
--- Comment #41 from Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 206016 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=206016&action=edit Bug 41297: (QA follow-up) Fix DBIC checksums and missing upgrade comment The VendorEdiAccount.pm result class carried a hand-edited, non-genuine md5sum comment ("md5sum:original_schema_bug_41297") left over from an unrelated edit. Running dbic --force with a real checksum in place caused DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader to treat the custom section as untrustworthy and drop the manual is_boolean decorations entirely. The Aqcontact.pm checksum was also stale - it had not been recomputed after edi_error_notification was added by hand, so the file didn't match what a genuine dbic run would produce. Regenerated both files with a real `dbic --force` run against the migrated database, then restored the is_boolean flags for VendorEdiAccount.pm below the DO NOT MODIFY marker. Also add the missing COMMENT clause to the edi_error_notification ALTER TABLE in the atomicupdate, so upgraded instances get the same column comment ('is the edi error notification contact') as a fresh install via kohastructure.sql. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
