http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9011
--- Comment #31 from Paul Poulain <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Galen Charlton from comment #25) > Broader question: do we really need another field in the items table? Why > not just tweak AnonymiseIssueHistory() so that if StoreLastBorrower is set, > old_issue rows that are the most recent return for their items are not > anonymized? The more I think of it, the less I like this patch : it introduces a duplicate information in our database: the last patron is in old_issues and in items.last_borrower I agree that the old_issues information can be removed by anonymisation. But a better option, imho, would be to improve anonymization, to have something like: * anonymize * anonymize except the last patron * don't anonymize However, I'm not the RM, so Galen final cut. But I really think that, on the long term, this patch introduces some inconsistencies, and thus, pain. (Sorry not to have written this earlier) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
