http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8307
Galen Charlton <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Passed QA |Pushed to Master CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #26 from Galen Charlton <[email protected]> --- Pushed to master. Thanks, Jonathan! Being able to set item record values during receiving will be well received, but I must say that I am not a fan of how things have drifted: - It would be better to refer to item fields by their names, not how they happen to be mapped in a MARC framework. (By the way, I have an itch to stamp out the use of AddItemFromMarc and ModItemFromMarc, replacing it with direct calls to AddItem / ModItem, or their eventual DBIC equivalents. A helper routine to map a MARC field to an item should be used only when necessary -- during record import, primarily, and not item record editing). - It's not great that depending on what stage of the process you're dealing with, the configuration interface is either a syspref or the MARC frameworks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
