http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11453
--- Comment #3 from Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <[email protected]> --- (In reply to mathieu saby from comment #2) > Hello Hi Mathieu and thanks for taking a look > Not sure of that, but I see that you added a 852 field. We don't use it in > France, but I suppose it is made for storing information about items, which > are stored in 995 in UNIMARC Koha. For what I can see UNIMARC 852 is very similar to MARC21 852 (http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/concise/bd852.html) That is not used on MARC21 Koha, we use 952 instead. > I unterstand it is part of the IFLA standard, but don't you think this could > be source of mistakes ? I'm not sure of the best way of dealing with that: > maybe not creating 852 field in a fist time? or adding a comment in the fied > name to prevent mistakes? > And maybe on a long run, we could envision to move items from 995 to 852 ?? > On MARC21 framework it's hidden so is not a problem, may be the same could be done on UNIMARC. And all new fields are hidden by default. If you load the framework the only visible field is 856 Bernardo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
