http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11023
Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #18 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- Is there any reason this couldn't be done using dateaccessioned rather than adding a new field to items? I imagine the test for items being 'new' is less than simple in some cases, and I can see a definite advantage in pre-setting items as new rather than determining that on the fly for every item. QA Issue: biblioitems_columns doesn't seem like it belongs in Items.pm, you could easily use DBIx::Class to get the columns names: http://search.cpan.org/~frew/DBIx-Class-0.08121/lib/DBIx/Class/ResultSource.pm#columns so no need for a special subroutine! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
